ISRAEL
POPULATION: 7 million (less than half of Mumbai)
AREA SIZE: Less than that of Kerala
ACT OF VIOLENCE AGAINST IT: 2 soldiers kidnapped by Hezbolla, 1 by Hamas
RETALIATORY ACTION: war on Lebanon, 200 rockets fired the next day .
INDIA
POPULATION: 1 billion+
AREA SIZE: 6th largest in the world
ACT OF VIOLENCE AGAINST IT: 200+ dead in Mumbai blast, 8 in Kashmir
RETALIATORY ACTION: a soft speech by PM, Salute to mumbai people , clean chit for SIMI by UP CM
Proud! Proud of the ineptitude...
2 weeks ago
12 comments:
i wud like 2 see it in another way.... if india wanted, it could have destroyed the whole of Pakistan in one day... but y shud we punish the innocent civilians for the act of terrorisms done by some brainwashed fuckhead.... bcos thats not the indian tradition....
but i do agree that keeping quiet in this way is going a bit too far with the idea of ahimsa....we should have atleast attacked the terrorist camps at the border, of which our surveillance teams have full knowledgee....ahimsa to them is like himsa to the innocentt...
It isn't about destroying Pakistan...use pressure tactics to bring them down...use force to destroy the terrorist camps...use effective diplomacy...
Strike a balance...
The one force that cud hav influenced kept mum in both cases...aah!..u guesse it rgt fella...The U.S...
In Isreal's case a silent approval..
In India's case a silent disapproval of India identifyin Pak as the root cause of the trouble..
@chandran: US is selectively blind...a cripple...a burden...
Hi Rockus
I agree to your comment to Chandran "US is selectively blind...a cripple...a burden..." US Govt. supports Pak and shows sympathy to us wtf.
Nidhi
This UPA Govt. is weak!!thts the main problem!!this was not the case wen NDA was ter!!! hmmmm...lets c wht will happen!!
@nidhi: You are right...we need no sympathy from the devil...what we need is for them to shut the f**k up when we retaliate...
@naveen: UPA is just a grandiose alliance of mega selfish politicians...NDA was far better...atleast they had some guts...
"non-violence to be essential because it afforded the only democratic means of struggle. It was available to everyone--not only to those who owned weapons. Secondly, a violent victory, even a just one, would only prove that violence triumphed, not necessarily justice. A violent solution would mean that the fate of the unarmed many would be mortaged to the benevolence of the armed few"
In this post nuclear world freedom will be attained only thorough army aggressions.More secure the country more free it is.Jews live in the dangerous place on earth.Peace cannot be established without a powerful army...sometimes violence is inevitable for the freedom.Counting the civilian lives wont make any reason to attack, but accountable to mean human sympathy.Only those governments who love their armymen are the one giving freedom and peace in their country.
Does India love her army than USA?
"non-violence to be essential because it afforded the only democratic means of struggle. It was available to everyone--not only to those who owned weapons. Secondly, a violent victory, even a just one, would only prove that violence triumphed, not necessarily justice. A violent solution would mean that the fate of the unarmed many would be mortaged to the benevolence of the armed few"
In this post nuclear world freedom will be attained only thorough army aggressions.More secure the country more free it is.Jews live in the dangerous place on earth.Peace cannot be established without a powerful army...sometimes violence is inevitable for the freedom.Counting the civilian lives wont make any reason to attack, but accountable to mean human sympathy.Only those governments who love their armymen are the one giving freedom and peace in their country.
Does India love her army than USA?
@erogat:Jews brought this insecurity upon themselves...they were too aggressive in their approach against the arabs...and i don't agree with what you have said about peace in a country...You need not be a bully to enjoy peace and freedom...and above everything else comes humanity...there is no way you can justify killing of innocent children...let me sight an example...if you kidnapped an Indian and dissapeared...I come and murder your kids...will that solve my problem?
Killing families... children..women...civilians..all relate to genocide by uncivilized.But how will u prevent a genocide in a nation? In war, its "authoritative" genocide, again its uncivilized.Only a powerful army prevent mishaps in a nation,but none in earth have one.War as a reason for genocide, is made in an objective of reducing enemy's populi and weaken their uprising or to evanish them.Its a collective plan.Its the fate of human civilization he created for himself.There are uncountable massacres of children in all the modern war.In past wars were between armies of kingdoms.There were laws for the war...like the Kurukshethra war had.But now its arrogance of ignorant leaders.Ancient men were more civilized than todays..as years go by..we will breed the biotech neanderthals ..and we yell the most civilized in universe.No wonder UFOs aint land.
@erogat: I raise my glass for that...man is uncivlised and genocide has occured right from his inception...UFO's hmmmm they do land...mine is parked just outside! :P
Post a Comment